Jesika Maleckova vs Nicole Fossa Huergo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jul at 06:46 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Maleckova vs N. Fossa Huergo

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Maleckova 1 - 0 Huergo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jesika Maleckova winning 2 and Nicole Fossa Huergo winning 0. The last match between Jesika Maleckova and Nicole Fossa Huergo was at the Prague Open - Prague, 20-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Jesika Maleckova getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maleckova | 1 |
| Huergo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Prague Open - Prague(07-20-25)
J. Maleckova vs N. F. Huergo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $16,458 | Career Prize Money | $20,160 |
| 59.16% (368-254) | Career Total W/L | 57.02% (260-196) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
J. Maleckova vs N. F. Huergo Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Huergo has won 40.4% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Maleckova has a slightly better percentage at 43.31%.
- Return Game: Analysis of recent matches shows Huergo winning 50.97% of points on their opponent's second serve, slightly edging out Maleckova's 50.27%. However, for first serve returns, Huergo is significantly stronger with 35.15% compared to Maleckova's 28.94%.
- Under Pressure: When saving breakpoints, Huergo performs slightly better, saving 47.9% compared to Maleckova's 46.99%.
- Performance Over the Last Year: Both players have similar win rates over the past year, with Huergo winning 57.32% of matches and Maleckova 57.58%.
- Best Surface: Huergo excels on clay courts with a 59% win rate, whereas Maleckova's best performance is on hard courts with a 64% win rate.
- Competitive Level: In the Challenger and ITF tournaments over $10K, Huergo holds a slight edge with a 59.42% win rate compared to Maleckova's 56.67%.
- Opponent Quality: Huergo has faced slightly tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 332.7 versus Maleckova's 352.15.
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets over the last year, Huergo has a better win rate at 38% compared to Maleckova's 33%.
- Break Point Conversion: Huergo has been more effective in recent break point conversions at 46.52%, significantly better than Maleckova’s 33.33%.
Editorial Prediction (July 19, 2025, UTC):
When examining the recent performance metrics, Huergo demonstrates a consistent edge in several critical areas, including return game efficiency and breakpoint conversion. These factors often translate into match victories.
Although Maleckova shows a slight advantage in second serve performance, Huergo's superior first serve return, alongside more effective breakpoint handling, suggests a tactical edge in matches. Furthermore, Huergo has a stronger record in deciding sets and against higher-ranked opponents.
Given these observations, Huergo appears to have the upper hand in this upcoming match. Therefore, based on current data and trends, Huergo is the more likely victor in this contest.
Jesika Maleckova vs Nicole Fossa Huergo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Maleckova vs N. F. Huergo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:40:45 | Average Match Time | 1:40:45 |
| 56% (33/59) | 1st Serve % | 52% (32/62) |
| 76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (20/32) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 44% (27/62) | Return Points Win % | 31% (18/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Maleckova Recent Matches Played
N. F. Huergo Recent Matches Played

J. Maleckova vs N. F. Huergo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.16% (368/254) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.02% (260/196) |
| 57.74% (806/590) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.85% (571/470) |
| 54.13% (6769/5737) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (5046/4467) |
| 63.16% (24/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.52% (34/32) |
| 60.24% (250/165) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.01% (210/152) |
| 56.63% (94/72) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (16/12) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1004 | Aces Total | 433 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1351 | Total Double Faults | 1286 |
| 1:7:28 | Average Match Time | 1:17:36 |
| 546.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.1 |
| 55% (15166/27573) | 1st Serve % | 67% (14440/21454) |
| 63% (9612/15166) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (8768/14440) |
| 46% (5708/12407) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3072/7014) |
| 50% (1837/3639) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1383/2678) |
| 47% (13180/28002) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9931/21304) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 35.00% (14/26) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 58.44% (263/187) | Challenger W/L | 53.16% (126/111) |
| 72.22% (91/35) | Futures W/L | 62.75% (128/76) |
| 60% (361/604) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (255/448) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (48/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (42/88) |
| 55% (94/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (80/137) |
| 88% (353/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (258/225) |
| 12% (353/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (258/33) |
| 21% (265/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (198/34) |